(Sex)ability Goes All The Way

Sexual health must be understood holistically including both physiological and subjective sexual functioning. Physiological sexual functioning refers to physical aspects such as the sexual response cycle, frequency, and quality of sexual behaviour, whereas subjective sexual functioning reflects an individual’s appraisal of their sexuality, such as satisfaction with sexual function, or quality of current intimate relationships (Eisenberg et al., 2015). Both psychological and subjective sexual functioning can be negatively impacted by injury and/or disability. Unless you have been personally affected, or are connected to someone who has been affected by disability, you may have never had to imagine what it would be like to have sex under these limitations. Disability can be understood as a result of the interaction between characteristics of the individual and those of their environment (Eisenberg et al., 2015). Using this definition, the importance of adaptation in efforts to diminish disability is realized. It highlights that the interaction between the individual and their environment is the causal factor for disability and not the person’s impairment itself. Some may believe that those who rely on a wheelchair for mobility as a result of paralysis, stroke, cerebral palsy, etc., do not engage in the act of sexual intercourse at all. However, this is not true! The sex lives of those in wheelchairs are often quite active. As described by Eisenberg et al. (2015) disability shapes a person’s physical, emotional, mental, and social experience and expression of their own sexual nature. I hope to address a need to spark discussion about disability-relevant variations of intimate relationships and sexual activity.

Factors affecting sexual health in those with disability can stem from direct consequences of the injury or disease, and also from indirect consequences associated with the condition that interfere with sexual experience. According to Eisenberg et al. (2015), direct factors include any disruptions to the physiological sexual response cycle that are a direct consequence of the injury or disease (i.e. erectile dysfunction after spinal cord injury). Conversely, indirect factors refer to issues associated with the condition (i.e. mobility, bowel and bladder function, cognitive functioning, etc.), as well as psychosocial elements associated with living with a disability (i.e. negative body image) that interfere with the overall sexual experience. Too often the development of sexual rehabilitation plans seeks to restore what would be considered “normal” sexual functioning by focusing on only the direct factors impeding on one’s sexual health. Unfortunately, such a narrow focus discriminates in favour of able-bodied individuals, neglects the psychosocial factors such as body image, sexual self-esteem, internalized negative stereotypes about disability, and cognitive issues that are just as important to address during therapy. These indirect consequences appear to be particularly important predictors of the quality of one’s subjective sexual functioning. Eisenberg et al. (2015) describes a sex-positive, adaptation-focused approach to assessment and treatment that draws on strengths as opposed to focusing on the limitations of people with disability. Sexual assessment is the first step in communicating to a person with disability that the health care provider understands the value of sexual health as part of whole health and is open to discussing sexual issues according to Eisenberg et al. (2015). Assessing the needs of persons with disability seeking medical, and/or mental health care for issues related to sexuality requires an integrated biopsychosocial approach.

How do people in wheelchairs even have sex, you may ask? Well, just like any other person, usually in bed! However, many of the direct consequences of disability can be addressed using aids to help adapt sexual activity. Current aids available on the market include equipment such as vibrators, sex swings, sex wedges, sex chairs (i.e. IntimateRider), and restraints. The partners of wheelchair users have admitted that the wheelchair itself becomes a sexual aid at times. Most modern wheelchairs have removable armrests, swing away footplates, folding backrests, locking brakes, and power tilt, all of which can be used easily to accommodate wheelchair sex and greater sexual freedom. Just as you would for sex in any chair, sliding the male or female’s bottom to the front edge of the wheelchair seat gives greater access for sex. It is important to experiment with your partner, and encourage open dialogue with them. The process of re-learning about your body, or your partner’s body, new likes, and dislikes, can be a pleasurable one. There are many blogs and online forums that allow people with disabilities to ask questions, share their experiences, and provide great suggestions to others. For example, Graham Streets, founder of the Mad Spaz Club Blog, shares a few tips on how to better enjoy sex as a person with disability. He advises that some sex positions are easier to do than others in bed. With that, he cautions when limited sensation below the level of spinal cord injury exists, sensitivity above the level of injury often increases and can become hypersensitive and encourages partners to explore and pleasure these new sensitive spots. He also highlights a new appreciation for scented candles, rose petals, lingerie, nudity, enticement, and foreplay for all sexes as a reminder that sexual intimacy is more than just penetrative intercourse.

Those who were born with, or have acquired a disability of some sort are not damaged goods unable to participate in sexual intimacy, sex is an activity for everyone. Prioritizing the sexual rights of people with disabilities, as well as abolishing stereotypes, and taboos will ensure that people with disabilities, have greater education and access to positive subjective and physiological sexual functioning. Adjustment to disability is an active, ongoing process. Whether it be a medical or a psychological intervention, effective treatment requires a sex-positive, biopsychosocial approach. We must adapt the sexual script to emphasize the strengths of persons with disability putting the patient first, and not the desire to restore normalcy.

Brittany McBeath, BAH, Psychology.

References

Eisenberg, N. W., Andreski, S-R., & Mona, L. R. (2015). Sexuality and physical disability: A disability affirmative approach to assessment and intervention within health care. Current Sexual Health Reports, 7(1): 19-29.

Streets, G. (2011, October 15). Wheelchair sex after spinal cord injury. [Mad Spaz Club Web Blog]. Retrieved from http://www.streetsie.com/spinal-injury-wheelchair-sex/comment-page-1/#comments

Asexuality; The Unicorn of Sexual Orientation

What is asexuality and why is it the unicorn of sexual orientation? Well, asexuality simply refers to an individual who does not experience sexual attraction – which refers to the attraction you feel that causes you to want to be physically intimate with someone (8). Asexuality is not a very common occurrence as it only occurs in about 1% of the population (10). Much like sexuality is a spectrum, asexuality has its own spectrum. Asexuality is the umbrella term that refers to the complete lack of sexual attraction. From here there are two subcategories, gray asexuals and demisexuals. Gray asexuality refers to individuals who sometimes experience sexual attraction to a person (2). Demisexuals on the other hand, only experience sexual attraction once a close emotional bond has been formed with a person (2).

Asexuals are often referred to as unicorns, because much like unicorns, a significant amount of the population does not believe that they exist (7). Many examples of a unicorn representing asexuality can be seen on social media sites and crafted images online (see link 1 and link 2 ). These images are typically created by asexual individuals who try to make light of the situation and spread awareness that asexuality does in fact exist. Thankfully, the disbelief of asexuality being a legitimate sexual orientation has been shrinking due to increased amounts of media representation and discussions within popular culture.

You might be thinking, “I thought bisexuals were the unicorns?”, and you would be correct. Though for bisexuals, being a unicorn refers to the individual who is willing to be the third party to a heterosexual relationship (meaning there is a male and female) on a sexual level (1). In the past, the term unicorn for a bisexual person similarly referred to the fact that no one believes they exist, much like how it is used for asexuals now.  However, with greater acceptance and understanding of bisexuality, the term has evolved and is no longer considered to be imaginary. With the growing amount of research and media attention that asexuality is currently receiving, it is possible that the metaphor of a unicorn for asexuals will also cease to exist.

To clarify a few points: Asexuality is not the same as abstinence or celibacy. Celibacy refers to an individual who is consciously choosing to avoid sexual activity, and is common in religions such as Christianity (4). Abstinence refers to an individual who is choosing to refrain from sexual activity, usually for reasons other than religion (4). While celibacy and abstinence are choices, asexuality is not and it does not mean that the individual is choosing to refuse/avoid engaging in sexual activity, as many asexual individuals are sexually active (6). The degree to which an asexual is sexually active varies from person to person, just as it does with non-asexuals, or allosexuals.

Asexuality also does not mean that asexuals do not experience romantic attraction, do not to have sex or do not enjoy sex, or that they do not masturbate (6). Romantic attraction and sexual attraction are not the same. As previously stated, sexual attraction refers to attraction you feel that causes you to want to be intimately close with someone, whereas romantic attraction refers to the emotional response that you feel to someone you are close to (9). For every sexual attraction orientation, there is also a romantic orientation. For example, heterosexual and heteroromantic, homosexual and homoromantic, bisexual and biromantic, asexual and aromantic (lack of romantic feelings) etc. It is possible to identify as any combination of these orientations. This is the case for asexuals, just because an asexual does not experience sexual attraction does not mean that they also do not experience romantic attraction (being aromantic). It is very common to see asexual individual that also identify as heteroromantic, homoromantic, biromantic, or another romantic orientation (6).

Identifying as asexual does not mean that the individual experiences no sexual response or has a sexual dysfunction. In fact, Brotto and Yule (2011) suggests that there is no difference in genital arousal response (physiological sexual arousal which includes; pulsing/throbbing of the genitals and the warming of the genitals) when viewing an erotic film when comparing asexual, heterosexual, homosexual, and bisexual women. Furthermore, this study also showed that there is no difference in subjective sexual arousal (i.e., feeling “turned on”) between the four groups of women (3). These two results show that asexual individuals seen as a sexual dysfunction, as it is commonly seen as, because asexual individuals show no significant difference in their ability to experience subjective or physiological arousal when compared to allosexuals.

A final misconception about asexuality is that it is a sexual issue. Many people believe that individuals who identify as asexual have disorders such as sexual aversion disorder or hypoactive sexual desire disorder (HSDD). But this is not the case. A study by Houdenhove and colleagues (2014) found that unlike those with sexual aversion disorder, asexual individuals are not motivated by avoiding sexual encounters (5).  The study also looked at the similarities and differences between individuals who identified as asexual and those who have HSDD. They found that asexual individuals, unlike individuals with HSDD, do not experience any sexual distress (5). This finding lead the researchers to propose that identifying as asexual be an exclusion criterion when diagnosing HSDD (5). Houdenhove and colleagues (as well as the study by Brotto and Yule, 2011) found that there is no difference in genital arousal between asexual and non-asexual women, which suggested that asexuality and HSDD are not the same thing (5).

In conclusion, there are at least three main types of asexuality: Asexual, which is the complete lack of sexual attraction; gray asexual, which is occasional sexual attraction; and demisexual, which is when sexual attraction only occurs once an emotional bond has been formed. Due to the lack of asexuality awareness, asexuals are often referred to as unicorns. Misconceptions about asexuality include the following: asexuality is the same as abstinence or celibacy, asexuals suffer from some sort of sexual dysfunction, asexuals do not experience romantic attraction, asexuals do not masturbate, and asexuals do not have or enjoy sex. These misconceptions can lead to asexual individuals feeling marginalized in society and/or that there is something wrong with them because they do not feel sexual attraction. With the growing recognition of asexuality as a legitimate sexual orientation in both research and the media, this type of marginalization and negativity should lessen, making society a much nicer place for asexual individuals to live.

Crystal Tripple, BscH, Psychology, Queens University.

(Edited by Shannon M. Coyle, M.A., and Caroline Pukall, Ph.D., C.Psych.)

Links of Interest:

http://www.asexuality.org/home/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LSQF-r959OI

 

References

  1. Alptraum, L. (2016, July 19). Bisexual Women Are Not Going To Be Your Sex Unicorn ... Retrieved October 19, 2016, from http://www.vidsshare.com/watch/Bisexual-Women-Are-Not-Going-To-Be-Your-Sex-Unicorn-VideoDownload_Z2FmekFITG9vM2M.html
  2. Asexuality, Attraction, and Romantic Orientation. (n.d.). Retrieved October 19, 2016, from https://lgbtq.unc.edu/asexuality-attraction-and-romantic-orientation
  3. Brotto, L. A., & Yule, M. A. (2011). Physiological and Subjective Sexual Arousal in Self-Identified Asexual Women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 699-712. doi:10.1007/s10508-010-9671-7
  4. Difference between Celibacy and Abstinence - TheyDiffer.com. (2015, December). Retrieved October 19, 2016, from http://theydiffer.com/difference-between-celibacy-and-abstinence/
  5. Houdenhove, E. V., Gijs, L., T’Sjoen, G., & Enzlin, P. (2014). Asexuality: Few Facts, Many Questions. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 40(3), 175-192. doi:10.1080/0092623X.2012.751073
  6. How to Understand Asexual People: 8 Steps (with Pictures). (n.d.). Retrieved October 19, 2016, from http://www.wikihow.com/Understand-Asexual-People
  7. (n.d.). Retrieved October 19, 2016, from http://www.asexuality.org/home/?q=overview.html
  8. McLay, A. (2012, May 28). Asexuals Aren’t Unicorns. Retrieved October 19, 2016, from http://taboojive.com/asexuals-arent-unicorns/
  9. Romantic attraction. (n.d.). Retrieved October 19, 2016, from https://www.asexuality.org/wiki/index.php?title=Romantic_attraction
  10. What Is Asexuality :: What Is Asexuality? (n.d.). Retrieved October 19, 2016, from http://www.whatisasexuality.com/intro/