Swipe, Match, Ego Boost: The Surprising Motivations of Tinder Culture

Swipe Right, Swipe Left: Decoding the Tinder Matrix

Tinder is a popular mobile dating app that allows users to browse and connect with potential matches in their geographical area. Users employ a simple swiping mechanism, where they can swipe right if interested in someone or left if they are not. If both users independently swipe right on each other’s profiles, it creates a match, and they can then communicate through the app.

Hookup or Hype? The Myth of Tinder's Casual Culture

Despite the app’s association with “hookup culture” and the common perception that its primary use is to pursue casual sex (Strugo & Muise, 2019), research asserts otherwise. In fact, a 2017 study (Timmermans & De Caluwé, 2017) found that casual sex is actually among the least common motives for Tinder use! Does that mean that people are shifting away from using Tinder for casual sex in favour of finding “the one”? Maybe so. But even more interesting, much of the motivation for Tinder use appears to be completely unrelated to dating and sexual activity at all! Indeed, only a third of app users (Fowler & Both, 2020) report engaging in sexual activity with someone they had matched with on Tinder. That's right: the world's biggest ‘hookup app’ may not just be about hooking up.

The Tinder Effect: Boosting Egos and Breaking Hearts!

More often than you think, Tinder is used to fulfill more general social needs like self-validation and positive feedback. More and more research recognizes non-sexual motives in dating app use, such as entertainment seeking, ego-boosting, and self-worth validation (Timmermans & De Caluwé, 2017; Van De Wiele & Tong, 2014). Indeed, users commonly report using Tinder mostly because they wanted to receive positive feedback associated with getting a match. Positive interactions, compliments, and expressions of interest from others on Tinder can serve as positive reinforcement and can contribute to a sense of desirability and attractiveness. Studies (Lefevre, 2017; Sumter et al., 2016) showed that the trendiness and excitement of Tinder were even larger drivers of its use than motivations relating to its commonly perceived purpose: dating and sex. In a 2016 study interviewing 21 Tinder users, all but two described their use of the app for entertainment or an ego-boost (Ward, 2016). Getting an ego-boost may sound silly or shallow, but apparently, many of us have self-worth needs to fulfill!

Tinder can help to fulfill self-worth needs, such as receiving matches, a compliment in chats, or getting a SuperLike – these are all possible forms of getting an ego boost. Further, the large population of diverse users greatly increases the odds of expanding your social landscape compared to going to your regular Friday night bar scene! Indeed, the nature of the app, which emphasizes the number of matches and positive engagement with your profile, can serve as a form of social proof. Seeing that others find you interesting or attractive can reinforce a positive self-image.

Tinder Triumphs and Tribulations: Navigating the Swiping Rollercoaster

 While Tinder provides much potential for self-validation in a digital age, on the other hand, placing too much of our validation and self-worth in the hands of an internet dating app may have consequences. Rejection, lack of matches, or negative interactions on the platform can lead to feelings of insecurity or decreased self-esteem. Additionally, relying solely on external validation from a dating app may not lead to sustained feelings of self-worth, as it's crucial to have a balanced and healthy self-perception that goes beyond external validation. Individuals may overweigh the importance of a simplistic profile image, compared to deeper and more complex relationship attributes such as empathy, caring, respect, trust, loyalty and mutual goals and values. So, swipe or don’t swipe, it’s up to you, but be mindful of your emotions and the role that platforms like Tinder play in your life. It's essential to prioritize genuine connections, self-worth, and sexual self-efficacy that extends beyond the online realm.

Finnoula O'Neill-King, 4th year BSc Psychology, Queen's University 

 

References

Barrada, J. R., & Castro, Á. (2020). Tinder users: Sociodemographic, psychological, and psychosexual characteristics. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(21), 8047. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17218047

Elad, B. (2023, May 1). Tinder statistics - users, revenue, demographic and usage. Enterprise Apps Today. https://www.enterpriseappstoday.com/stats/tinder-statistics.html#:~:text=As%20of%202022%2C%20 Tinder%20has,2023%20it%20was%20105.9%20 million.

Fowler, S. A., & Both, L. E. (2020). The role of personality and risk-taking on tinder use. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 2(1), 100067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2020.100067

LeFebvre, L. E. (2017). Swiping me off my feet. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 35(9), 1205–1229. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407517706419

Purvis, J. (2021, October 6). Why using tinder is so satisfying. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2017/02/14/why-using-tinder-is-so-satisfying/

Seidman, G. (2017). Is tinder really a hookup app? . Psychology Today. https://www.psychologytoday.com/ca/blog/close-encounters/201706/is-tinder-really-hookup-app

Strugo, J., & Muise, A. (2019). Swiping for the right reasons: Approach and avoidance goals are associated with actual and perceived dating success on tinder. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 28(2), 93–104. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjhs.2019-0010

Sumter, S. R., Vandenbosch, L., & Ligtenberg, L. (2017). Love me tinder: Untangling emerging adults’ motivations for using the dating Application Tinder. Telematics and Informatics, 34(1), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2016.04.009

Timmermans, E., & De Caluwé, E. (2017). Development and validation of the Tinder Motives Scale (TMS). Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 341–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.028

Van De Wiele, C., & Tong, S. T. (2014). Breaking boundaries: the Uses & Gratifications of Grindr. Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. https://doi.org/10.1145/2632048.2636070

Ward, J. (2016). What are you doing on tinder? impression management on a matchmaking mobile app. Information, Communication & Society, 20(11), 1644–1659. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2016.1252412

Beyond the Pain: Unveiling the Link Between Pain Catastrophizing and Pain Disability in Endometriosis Warriors

When I hear the word “endometriosis,” the first thing that pops into my mind is “pain”—scorching, stabbing, debilitating pain. However, endometriosis (endo) is a condition that is often described and medically treated as a fertility issue [1]. While it’s true that endo can affect fertility, this label can overshadow the significant pain and discomfort that many individuals with endo experience. It’s like calling a hurricane a “wind problem”—it doesn’t quite capture the full impact, does it?

But there’s more to this story…the pain caused by endo can lead to disability, affecting a person’s ability to perform daily tasks and maintain a satisfying level of quality of life [2-7]. It’s not just about being unable to work or go to school—it’s about the constant adjustments and accommodations that must be made to manage the pain [8-10]. It’s about the social events missed, the hobbies given up, and the constant fatigue. It’s a disability that is often invisible to others, but all too real for those living with it. 

As we splash the world with a vibrant shade of yellow for Endometriosis Awareness Month, I’d like to highlight a recent study we conducted that acknowledges the painful experiences of persons with endometriosis and extends beyond the physical pain to examine psychological and physical impacts [11]. Our study focused on pain intensity, “pain catastrophizing,” a psychological response to anticipated or actual pain, and pain disability. What we discovered was that when pain cranks the volume to moderate or higher levels, pain catastrophizing and disability start to take center stage.

This is where the disability aspect really comes into play; we found that as pain catastrophizing increased, so did the level of disability. This means that the more a person ruminates on their pain, magnifies its impact, and feels helpless against it, the more likely they are to experience disability. This disability can manifest in many ways, from difficulty performing daily activities to decreased participation in social activities.

So, what does this all mean? It’s not just about the physical pain—it’s also about how we perceive and respond to it. Think of this as being at your favourite concert; the music (pain) is blaring, but how you react (catastrophizing) can determine whether you’re crowd surfing or covering your ears.

In conclusion, our study highlights the importance of addressing both the physical and psychological aspects of endo. It’s not enough to just treat the physical symptoms—we also need to address the psychological and physical impacts. This comprehensive approach can lead to better outcomes and an improved quality of life for those living with endo.

So, as we continue to raise awareness about endo this month, let’s not forget about the importance of comprehensive care for individuals with this condition. Health care providers are urged to look at the big picture, considering not just the physical symptoms, but also the psychological and social implications of the condition.

This study is a step forward in our understanding of how endo affects individuals; it reminds us that raising awareness about endo is not just about recognizing the condition, but also understanding the complexities of the pain and disability it can cause. As we continue to learn more, we can hope for better care and an improved quality of life for those living with endo.

If you’re interested in reading an abstract on our recent publication on pain catastrophizing and pain disability in a diverse sample of persons with endo, click here. If you’re looking for the full PDF version, email us! If you’re interested in more results from our studies on endo, check out this blog and these poster presentations. For more information on endo, including what it is, who can ‘have’ it, the underpinnings of why we only have information on certain populations of people with endo, and how to receive a diagnosis, see our blog from March 2022.

Sam Levang, M.Sc. (she/her)
Ph.D. Student, Clinical Psychology
Sexual Health Research Lab
Queen’s University

 References

  1. Jones CE. The pain of endo existence: toward a feminist disability studies reading of endometriosis. Hypatia. 2016;31(3):554–71. doi: 10.1111/hypa.12248

  2. Van Niekerk L, Johnstone L, Matthewson M. Health-related quality of life in endometriosis: The influence of endometriosis-related symptom presence and distress. J Health Psychol. 2022;13591053221085051. doi: 10.1177/13591053221085051 

  3. Soliman AM, Coyne KS, Zaiser E, et al. The burden of endometriosis symptoms on health-related quality of life in women in the United States: a cross-sectional study. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol. 2017;38(4):238–48. doi: 10.1080/0167482X.2017.1289512

  4. Ruszała M, Dłuski DF, Winkler I, et al. The state of health and the quality of life in women suffering from endometriosis. J Clin Med. 2022;11(7):2059. doi: 10.3390/jcm11072059

  5. Martins J, Ferreira G, Vilaça M, et al. Quality of life and sexual satisfaction in women with endometriosis: the moderator role of symptom severity. Psychol Sex. 2022;13(4):952–64. doi: 10.1080/19419899.2021.1943501 

  6. Márki G, Bokor A, Rigó J, et al. Physical pain and emotion regulation as the main predictive factors of health-related quality of life in women living with endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2017;32(7):1432–8. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex091  

  7. de Barros Meneguetti M, Silva FP, Dias GN, et al. Assessment of quality of life and psychological repercussions in women with endometriosis according to pain intensity. Psychol Health Med. 2022;1–10. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2022.2121972

  8. Culley L, Law C, Hudson N, et al. The social and psychological impact of endometriosis on women’s lives: a critical narrative review. Hum Reprod Update. 2013;19(6):625–39. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmt027 

  9. Klein S, D’Hooghe T, Meuleman C, et al. What is the societal burden of endometriosis-associated symptoms? A prospective Belgian study. Reprod BioMed Online. 2014;28(1):116–24. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.09.020 

  10. Simoens S, Dunselman G, Dirksen C, et al. The burden of endometriosis: costs and quality of life of women with endometriosis and treated in referral centres. Hum Reprod. 2012;27(5):1292–9. doi: 10.1093/humrep/des073

  11. Levang SL, Pukall CF. An investigation of associations between pain catastrophizing and pain disability in a diverse sample of persons with endometriosis. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2024;102340. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2023.102340